Thu, 06 Jul 2006
Visual Studio : Debug and Release Builds II
Some people don't get why the stupidity of separate Debug and Release build settings is so bad. Let me spell it out.
The problem is that for any near sensible project, the Debug and Release build settings are mostly the same. It would therefore make much more sense if visual studio kept a single copy of the stuff thats the same and only kept separate versions of settings when the settings are genuinely different. To me this bleeding obvious, so why is this so hard for the Windiots at microsoft and the people who use their software? Why do microsoft's customers put up with crap like this?
I believe that using microsoft products exclusively makes people stupid.
![[operator<< is not my friend]](http://yosefk.com/c++fqa/images/operator.png)
